Where Do Cars Get Damaged Most? Front, Rear and Side Data

DentLID data study / Location brief

Car damage locations: front, rear and side.

The front is where first contact is recorded most often. The sides lead when every damaged area is counted. Both statements are true because they measure different things.

CRSS 2022-2024 268,598 known initial-contact records Published September 2026
54.5% of known initial-contact locations were in the front group
Blueprint-style editorial grouped-zone illustration of where initial contact began, with the front group dominant, followed by rear and side groups
Illustrative zone mapThe car shows the published front, side and rear grouping. Exact values appear in the charts below.
The short answer

Front first.
Sides across the record.

In DentLID’s weighted analysis of the 2022-2024 NHTSA Crash Report Sampling System, the broad front group accounted for 54.5% of moving vehicles with a known initial-contact location. That combines the front center and both front corners.

But the damage-area file can record several locations for one vehicle. In that second measure, the combined side group was the largest category at 27.9% of all weighted damage-area records.

Initial contact54.5%

Front center plus front corners

All areas27.9%

Side-area records

Rear group24.9%

Known initial-contact locations

01

One impact is not the same as one damaged area.

Initial point of impact identifies one location where contact began. Damage areas can include multiple locations on the same vehicle. Comparing them without keeping their denominators separate creates a misleading answer.

How the location map works

Think of the car as a clock face.

NHTSA’s public files describe exterior locations with clock-position labels. Twelve o’clock is the center of the front and six o’clock is the center of the rear. The remaining positions continue around the vehicle perimeter.

DentLID combined those detailed codes into broader consumer-readable regions. This makes the comparison easier to scan, but each group covers a different share of the perimeter.

Blueprint-style top-down vehicle showing the broad front, side and rear location groups
Front12 · 11 · 1
Sides2 · 3 · 4 · 8 · 9 · 10
Rear6 · 5 · 7
The vehicle faces left. DentLID translated NHTSA clock-position codes into three broad consumer-readable regions.
Front12 + 11 + 1Center and both front corners
Sides2 + 3 + 4 + 8 + 9 + 10Six positions across both sides
Rear6 + 5 + 7Center and both rear corners

Measure one

Where did contact begin?

Among records with a known initial-contact location, the front center alone represented 41.35%. The two front corners added 13.10%, bringing the broad front group to 54.45%.

The rear group accounted for 24.86%: 19.71% at the rear center and 5.15% at the rear corners. Sides represented 14.23%. The remaining 6.45% combined other or non-collision locations, the top and the undercarriage.

Read the denominator. These percentages describe moving vehicles with a known coded location in police-reported crashes. They do not describe every scratch, door ding or parking-lot dent in the United States.
Bar chart showing front 54.5 percent, rear 24.9 percent, sides 14.2 percent and other locations 6.5 percent for initial contact
Source: DentLID analysis of NHTSA CRSS 2022-2024. Percentages use survey weights and known initial-contact records.
Blueprint-style editorial grouped-zone illustration of all recorded damage areas, with side regions leading and front and rear regions also shown
Illustrative zone mapMultiple areas may be counted for one vehicle. Exact hypotheses are not encoded in this image.
One starting pointcan leave several recorded areas.

That is why a front impact can contribute a front-center record, a front-corner record and one or more side-area records in the damage file.

Bar chart showing sides as 27.9 percent of recorded damage areas followed by front center at 26.0 percent
Each record is a coded damage area, not a unique vehicle. Categories shown account for 95.3% of weighted records.

Measure two

Where was damage recorded?

The side group was the largest combined category at 27.90% of all weighted damage-area records. Front center followed at 25.96%, then front corners at 20.20%.

Rear center represented 11.81% and rear corners 9.41%. Top, undercarriage and no-damage codes together made up the remaining 4.73%.

The side group is broad: it combines six clock-position codes across both sides. It should not be interpreted as one door panel, and it does not identify the cause of the damage.

Damage can also spread beyond the location where contact began. Energy can deform adjoining sheet metal, trim and panel edges, while a vehicle may continue moving after the first touch. CRSS records the coded outcome visible in the police report, not a workshop-level reconstruction of how every mark developed.

This is why the area table is best used as a map of recorded involvement. It shows how often broad regions appear across damage records, but it cannot tell whether one mark caused another, how deep a deformation was or which repair method was ultimately used.

See the full U.S. crash-damage study

Three-year check

The leading patterns did not hinge on one year.

Front-center initial contact remained between 40.9% and 41.7% in each annual file. Side-area records remained between 27.5% and 28.2%.

Line chart showing stable front-center initial-contact and side damage-area percentages from 2022 through 2024
Annual weighted percentages are shown to one decimal place. Overlapping confidence intervals reinforce that small year-to-year movements should not be overinterpreted.

Reading the zones

What each location can tell us – and what it cannot.

Front54.5%

The dominant starting region

Front center and front corners together led known initial contact. This is a location result, not a statement about repair cost, severity or whether the panel can be repaired without paint.

Sides27.9%

The broadest recorded-area group

The side category led all damage-area records. Because it spans multiple clock positions, it can include fenders, doors, quarter panels and adjacent regions. It cannot be reduced to door dings.

Rear24.9%

A quarter of known first contacts

Rear center contributed most of the rear group. This does not prove that rear panels are easier or harder to repair; construction, access, paint and the shape of the damage still matter.

Repair reality

Location is not a PDR diagnosis.

A police report’s location code does not show paint condition, dent depth, stretched metal, prior filler, bracing behind the panel or safe tool access. Those details determine whether paintless dent repair may be appropriate.

A shallow door dent with intact paint may be a PDR candidate. A visually similar area with cracked paint, a sharp fold or structural damage may require a body shop. Start with clear photos, not the zone label alone.

The dataset can showWhere damage was coded
A technician must assessWhether PDR fits the actual damage

Methodology

Four steps from public files to a readable comparison.

Every result keeps the source, weighting and denominator visible.

01

Public files

We used the NHTSA CRSS 2022, 2023 and 2024 public-use CSV releases. CRSS is a nationally representative probability sample of police-reported crashes, from property-damage-only events through fatal crashes.

02

Survey weights

Every estimate uses the supplied WEIGHT field. We pooled the three annual files for percentages and retained year and sampling-unit identifiers when estimating standard errors.

03

Two files

vehicle.csv supplied one IMPACT1 value per moving vehicle. damage.csv supplied one or more DAMAGE records per vehicle.

04

Transparent grouping

Front combines 12, 11 and 1 o’clock. Rear combines 6, 5 and 7. Sides combine 2, 3, 4, 8, 9 and 10. Top and undercarriage remain separate in the detailed results.

Sample scope: 268,598 records had a known initial-contact category after exclusions. The damage analysis used 559,398 sampled area records. Pooled weighted counts sum annual national estimates and should not be read as the number of unique crashes over a single year.

Questions, answered

What the location data does and does not mean.

Short answers to the interpretation questions most likely to change how these results are read.

Where do cars get damaged most in police-reported crashes?

For initial contact, the broad front group led at 54.5% among moving vehicles with a known location. For all recorded damage areas, the combined side group led at 27.9%. The answer changes because the measures use different records and denominators.

Why do sides lead the damage-area results?

A vehicle can have several recorded areas, and the side group combines six clock-position codes across both sides. The result says side locations appeared most often among all coded damage-area records; it does not say that one particular door was the most commonly damaged panel. For a separate view of stationary vehicles, see our parked car damage statistics study.

Does side damage in CRSS mean a door ding?

No. CRSS covers police-reported traffic crashes and does not represent the many minor door dings, cart contacts and parking-lot marks that are never reported. A side-area code also does not identify the object or mechanism by itself.

Can damage location tell me whether PDR will work?

No. Location is only one factor. A technician also needs to evaluate paint condition, depth, shape, metal stretch, panel construction, prior repair and access behind the damage.

Are these raw crash counts?

No. DentLID applied CRSS survey weights to produce national percentage estimates and calculated approximate 95% confidence intervals using the supplied sampling strata and primary sampling units. Sample record counts are shown separately from weighted estimates.

Your car is not a category

Let a technician see the actual panel.

Upload clear photos, vehicle details and ZIP. Available independent PDR technicians can review the damage and respond directly.

Upload dent photos
Scroll to Top